Skip to content
3arabawy
3arabawy

Hossam el-Hamalawy

  • Home
  • About
  • Archive
  • Blog
  • Photos
  • Books
3arabawy

Hossam el-Hamalawy

Tag: state backed unions

Activists call for formation of independent trade unions

Posted on 21/06/200809/04/2021 By 3arabawy

Sarah Carr reports on the Center for Socialist Studies meeting:

Increasing violations of workers’ rights and an unrepresentative, state-controlled, trade union structure necessitate the formation of independent, worker-led, trade unions in Egypt, say labor rights activists.
This was the conclusion of a discussion held Thursday in Cairo’s Center for Socialist Studies in which labor leaders and activists discussed the role of the Egyptian Trade Union Federation in the country’s labor movement.

Activists call for formation of independent trade unions

Workers allege that the Federation — the sole trade union organization in Egypt — has continuously betrayed workers’ interests.
They say that the state-controlled organization is emasculated by wide-ranging administrative and security body interference rendering it incapable of representing workers’ interests.
“It is significant that labor strikes are not being led by trade unions whose supposed role is to negotiate workers’ demands with employers,” Nagy Rashad, a labor activist within the Schindler Factory said.

Nagui Rashad ناجي رشاد

Egypt has recently witnessed a surge of industrial action which began after the December 2006 strike in the Ghazl El-Mahalla spinning factory in the Delta town of Mahalla.
“Most of these protests were against both employers and official trade unions which are controlled by the state and businesses via state security bodies which vet nominations to the Federation,” he continued.
Rashad said that there needs to be a radical change in the treatment of industrial action.
“There needs to be no interference in the right of workers to form their own unions and to take strike action.
“Labor protests must be treated as the expression of a problem in employee-employer relations rather than a criminal act.”
Journalist Mostafa Bassiouny, who moderated the event, pointed out that since its establishment in 1957, the federation had only called for one strike in 1993.

Mostafa Bassyouni مصطفى بسيوني

“It has been 50 years since the establishment of the federation. While its establishment was the fulfilment of a long-cherished dream for Egyptian workers, an alliance developed between it and the government — to the extent that workers launched protest action against their own unions, which have consistently opposed their interests,” Rashad explained.
Rashad said that the existing trade union structure requires a radical overhaul.
“An independent trade union federation requires true union freedoms — something which currently doesn’t exist.
“In addition private sector workers must be incorporated into the federation: millions of these workers are not members of any union. Finally, the federation’s role must be reinvigorated, so that trade unions are empowered to play an effective role in negotiations,” he continued.
Muhammad Abdel Salam also underlined the importance of integrating non-unionized workers in Egypt’s new industrial zones into the trade union structure.

Mohamed Abdel Salam محمد عبد السلام

“Only 20 percent of Egypt’s workforce is integrated in the federation; it is extremely unrepresentative,” he said. “No one seems concerned to reach out to workers in the new industrial towns. There are several thousand factories in Sixth of October, Tenth of Ramadan etc, and only six trade unions.”
“The Federation doesn’t reflect the size and potential of Egypt’s workforce,” Abdel Salam explained.
He pointed to the absence of democracy within the Federation as one of its major problems.
“The Federation has been appropriated by administrative and security bodies so that it doesn’t act as a source of pressure on the government.”
“The Ministry of Manpower oversees all aspects of the Federation’s activities,” Abdel Salam said.
Lawyer Haytham Mohamadein traced the historical development of the legislation governing trade union activity.

Haitham Mohamadein هيثم محمدين

He said that trade unions developed at the turn of the century and that their existence was not initially acknowledged by the law.
Mohamadein said that it was workers themselves who militated for a law — to protect them against police attacks.
“Workers called for a law to protect against police aggression and the first law acknowledging the existence of trade unions — as charity organizations defending workers’ rights — was promulgated in 1942.”
“This law was marked by a number of flaws which continue to exist in current legislation organizing trade unions.
“It deprived agricultural workers, nurses and servants from forming unions. It gave the Ministry of Social Affairs the right to oversee and approve the formation of trade unions and there were no provisions protecting workers from dismissal where they launched labor action.”
Mohamadein said that existing trade union legislation violates the Egyptian constitution by imposing conditions making trade union activity virtually impossible.
“The constitution gives workers the right to form unions: it doesn’t mention interference by administrative bodies in trade unions, nor restrict the number of unions in one workplace,”
“Existing law violates international instruments ratified by Egypt.”
Mohamadein made reference to Law 12, which organizes trade union activity and which was drafted by Cairo University professor Ahmad Hassan El-Borei.
Mohamadein said that collective bargaining is a sine qua non of Law 12.
“Five years after this law was promulgated El-Borei said that it required amendment. He said that the application of its main aim in practice had been rendered impossible because its central element – collective bargaining – no longer exists.
“When asked why it no longer exists, El-Borei said that the existing trade union structure doesn’t permit true collective bargaining in the name of workers — Law 12 is therefore based on a principle which doesn’t exist.”
Mohamadein emphasized that international law gives workers the right to organize themselves in independent trade unions.
“These instruments give the right to workers to form unions themselves, without prior permission and without administrative interference or supervision. They are also allowed to form more than one union within a single profession.”
“The formation of independent trade unions is a violation of neither international nor domestic law,” he said.
Kamal Abo Eita — one of the leaders of the historic December 2007 real estate tax collectors’ strike which workers won after a 10-day sit-in outside the Finance Ministry — called on workers to send letters notifying their federation trade union and employer of their resignation from the federation, as a prelude to the establishment of independent trade unions.

Kamal Abu Eita كمال أبو عيطة

He pointed out that Egypt was recently voted number seven in the International Labor Organization’s blacklist of the 10 worst violators of workers’ rights.
Abo Eita attributed this to the absence of plurality within the federation, and its heavy infiltration by state security bodies — who he told the seminar, take part in labor negotiations.
“Does the federation deserve LE 2 of my wages every month? I say it doesn’t,” Abo Eita said.

Mahalla testimony

Posted on 17/06/200807/02/2021 By 3arabawy

Testimony from a Mahalla labor organizer involved in the 6 April uprising:

The Textile Workers’ League activists were not invited to the meeting with Hussein Megawer (the head of the state-backed General Federation of Trade Unions and the leader of the ruling NDP parliamentary bloc). He knew they’d eat him alive if he asked them to do something like what he was going to ask from Muhammad el-Attar and his friends. Still, (Textile Workers’ League leaders) Kamal el-Fayoumi and Wael Habib rushed to Cairo as soon as they knew about the meeting, and waited for Attar and his men to show up in front of the HQ of the Federation. Attar, Habib and others were shocked and embarrassed to see them there…
As soon as everyone entered Megawer’s office, Attar tried to put on some show, only to be silenced by Megawer in a humiliating way..
“Shut up!” cried Megawer in the face Attar. “Not a single word! I want to hear only three things: We are sorry; There will not be a strike on 6 April; and production will increase on that day.” Then he handed over the delegation a ready made statement to sign, with their five names printed. The five signed, but Wael and Kamal refused. “If the workers are planning to strike on 6 April, then I’ll strike with them,” Wael said, while Kamal looked into Megawer’s eyes in challenge and said: “We are here to discuss the minimum wage. You didn’t say anything about that. We are not signing.”
Megawer lost it and started issuing threats to the Textile Workers’ League activists: “You will go behind the sun. Take my word for it.”

Below is a scanned copy of the pledge signed by Attar and his four comrades, praising the state-backed federation and general union, pledging not to strike on 6 April but to increase production, and accusing “political groups outside the factory” of trying to “stir troubles”. The statement was leaked out of Megawer’s office, and copies were distributed by the Textile Workers’ League activists in the factory in the days preceding the uprising to expose the betrayal.

خيانة إضراب 6 أبريل بالمحلة

ILO: Cronies of the World Unite!

Posted on 30/05/200802/01/2021 By 3arabawy

So the International Labor Organization is throwing a party:

More than 3,000 government, worker and employer leaders are to meet here from 28 May to 13 June for the annual Conference of the International Labour Organization (ILO) to discuss a wide range of issues including rural poverty reduction, the latest developments in labor rights and enhancing skills development.
The annual meeting of the ILO will also consider strategic challenges in terms of obtaining decent work, as well as host a high-level panel discussion on 11 June on “Tackling the Food Crisis through investment, production and decent work”.

I’m sure the outcome of the conference will be fantastic, putting into consideration the nature of the participants. For example, the Egyptian workers, according to a message I received from a Socialist source, are “represented” by delegation of more than 30 state-backed General Federation of Trade Unions officials.. those government cronies, whose local officials are unlected, winning their seats by forgery and vote rigging, and during strikes they are either “detained” by their fellow workers to be forced to stay in the occupation (like what happened in Kafr el-Dawar), or simply hospitalized (like what happened in Mahalla with poor Seddiq Siyam:). Those general federation cronies are now in Switzerland together with their fellow cronies from other parts of the world discussing “decent work”.. And what’s even more obscene is that the ILO invites those cronies from Egypt at a time when the regime has just put down a two-day uprising by the workers and urban poor in Mahalla, and is outright repressing the right to strike and peaceful protest, and is keeping the Ghazl el-Mahalla labor organizers in prison under martial law… all crimes where the General Federation of Trade Unions and its head the corrupt Hussein Megawer of the NDP are directly involved in.

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • …
  • 42
  • Next

Search 3arabawy

Follow 3arabawy

  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Instagram
  • X
  • YouTube
  • Spotify
©2026 3arabawy